论文分享｜粤港澳大湾区基础设施驱动的要素流动：多重危机下基础设施区域主义的兴起

香港大学促进公平与福祉的社会基础设施实验室(SIEW Lab)主任何深静教授与实验室成员刘永深博士在《International Journal of Urban Sciences》(IJUS) 发表题为“Infrastructuring mobilities in the Greater Bay Area: the rise of infrastructural regionalism at the conjuncture of polycrisis”的研究论文。该论文曾受期刊主编邀请，于2024年亚洲规划大会上作IJUS主旨报告。近日，该论文下载量和浏览量表现优异，Field-Weighted Citation Impact（FWCI）达到5.09，位列96百分位。凭借突出的学术影响力，论文获期刊遴选为开放获取（Open Access）文章。自即日起至2026年11月30日，读者可免费获取全文。诚邀各位学界同仁阅读并引用，期待与大家就相关研究展开交流讨论！

下载链接

He, S., & Liu, Y. (2026). Infrastructuring mobilities in the Greater Bay Area: the rise of infrastructural regionalism at the conjuncture of polycrisis. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2026.2653135

中文导读

随着多重危机(polycrisis)——包括全球经济放缓、高新技术竞争、地缘政治摩擦与疫情冲击等——在多个空间尺度上相互交织，粤港澳大湾区近年来正通过“基础设施修复”(infrastructural fix)重构跨境区域发展。既有关于基础设施区域主义(infrastructural regionalism)的研究多从“分配”(distribution)视角展开，强调基础设施建设在缓解区域内部社会空间不平等中的作用。本文则引入“流动性”(mobility)视角，将制度与社会层面的空间差异视为一种富有成效的不对称性，并指出国家通过基础设施建设对这种不对称性进行战略性运用，以激活创新驱动的区域经济并协调跨境治理。基于此，本文将这一动态过程概念化为“基础设施驱动的要素流动”(infrastructuring mobilities)，并识别出大湾区三种主要的跨境基础设施形态。第一种是“镜像型”基础设施，即通过将香港部分高校基础设施在内地城市进行复制，促进学生、科研人员、数据与象征资本等要素的常态化流动。第二种是“整合型”基础设施，其表现为教育、医疗与养老等社会基础设施的可达性由城市尺度拓展至区域尺度，从而推动更大规模的跨境日常通勤、短期出行与长期迁移。第三种是“飞地型”基础设施，即国家通过在特定空间推动大型项目建设，整合多元的基础设施功能，引导资本、人才与知识等要素流入，并将项目飞地塑造为区域经济发展的战略节点。本文将“基础设施驱动的要素流动”阐释为一种国家治理战略(statecraft)，并从技术性(technological)、话语性(discursive)与情感性(affective)三个治理维度，系统分析上述不同基础设施形态如何协调、促进要素跨境流动。最后，本文结合“情势分析”(conjunctural approach)的方法论视角，指出“基础设施驱动的要素流动”可作为一个中层理论概念(mid-level concept)，用于推进基础设施区域主义的厚描式理论化与跨案例的情境化解释。

本文识别出大湾区三种主要的跨境基础设施形态，即“镜像型”、“整合型”和“飞地型”。

论文摘要(Abstract)

At the conjuncture of multiscalar polycrisis – marked by global economic downturn, technological rivalry, geopolitical frictions, and pandemic disruptions – the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) has become a testing ground for an infrastructural fix to reconfigure cross-border regionalism. Moving beyond a distributional lens, this paper introduces a mobility perspective, viewing territorial-institutional and socio-spatial disparities not as obstacles to be rectified, but as productive asymmetries strategically leveraged by the state via infrastructural interventions to animate innovation-driven regional economies and orchestrate cross-boundary governance. We conceptualize such dynamics as infrastructuring mobilities and identify three distinct forms in the GBA. The mirrored form replicates and relocates Hong Kong’s academic infrastructures into mainland cities, generating routinized flows of students, researchers and symbolic capital. The integrated form entails the rescaling of access to social infrastructure (e.g. education, healthcare, and eldercare), enabling cross-border daily commuting, short-term visits, and long-term migration. The enclaved form consolidates diverse infrastructural functions within spatially bounded megaprojects, channelling inflows of capital, talent and knowledge to transform these enclaves into strategic nodes of innovation and productivity amid regional economic restructuring. Above all, this paper contributes to new regionalism and critical infrastructure studies by explicating infrastructuring mobilities as an emergent form of statecraft. To unpack its underlying features, we resolve infrastructuring mobilities into technological, discursive, and affective dimensions of governance in a regional context. This paper concludes with a brief reflection on the conjunctural approach as a heuristic for theorizing infrastructural regionalism, wherein infrastructuring mobilities can be operationalized as a mid-level concept.

作者简介

何深静

香港大学明德教授席Lady Edith Kotewall基金教授（建成环境），英国社会科学院院士，城市规划及设计系系主任，亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室香港基地主任，博士生导师。研究方向涵盖城市更新与住房发展、城乡融合、社会基础设施、跨境治理、气候韧性及健康地理。

刘永深

中山大学马克思主义学院助理教授、硕士生导师。研究方向为城市与区域治理、粤港澳大湾区建设。